ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: Two Generative AI Models Square Off

Investors started the week grappling with a significant shift in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) landscape. The unveiling of DeepSeek's R1 model triggered a sharp market reaction, shaking confidence in companies that have benefited from AI-driven tailwinds in recent years. Nvidia bore the brunt of the fallout, losing a record $589 billion market value in a single day. Renowned venture investor and technologist Marc Andreessen likened the launch to a "Sputnik moment for AI."

What's Driving the Market Reaction?

Shift from U.S. to China in AI Leadership

  • Silicon Valley has long led the AI race, but the launch of DeepSeek's R1 model has disrupted this dynamic. The focus has shifted from U.S. dominance to China's ability to develop a lower-cost model in a fraction of the time. The emergence of a viable alternative raises critical questions, such as: "Do we need as many GPUs or as much energy to build superior AI models?"

Lower barrier to entry drives AI commoditization

  • DeepSeek's R1 model was reportedly developed in just two months for $6 million—vastly lower than the $600+ million OpenAI spent on training ChatGPT. While some reports suggest DeepSeek may have illegally accessed OpenAI's data, the broader implication is clear: AI development costs are plummeting, leading to the possibility of AI becoming a commoditized technology.

Lower cost to operate

  • Running OpenAI's models costs over $100 per million tokens, while DeepSeek operates at under $4 per million. This cost advantage significantly broadens AI accessibility and gives DeepSeek a competitive edge over more expensive alternatives.

Moving from Closed-Source to Open-Source

  • U.S. companies have traditionally dominated AI with closed-source models, but DeepSeek is shifting the paradigm by embracing open-source AI. This approach allows anyone to use or modify the technology, fostering transparency and innovation. Meta is the only major U.S. company pursuing an open-source AI strategy.

Is the Market Overreacting?

Despite these shifts, skepticism remains. Key questions include whether U.S. enterprises will adopt Chinese AI technology and whether the U.S. government will impose regulatory barriers. The ongoing scrutiny of TikTok provides insight into potential future regulations.

Moreover, as Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella pointed out, DeepSeek's emergence may benefit the broader tech industry. According to Jevons Paradox, increased efficiency leads to greater demand. Nadella remarked, "As AI becomes more efficient and accessible, its adoption will skyrocket, making it an indispensable commodity."

To put the competition to the test, we compared ChatGPT and DeepSeek AI models by posing a series of pertinent questions and letting the two square off in a battle of the AIs.

Now, it's your turn to decide: which AI comes out on top?

*The above responses generated from assumptions developed by ChatGPT and DeepSeek are for illustrative purposes only.

DISCLOSURE: Securities highlighted or discussed in this communication are mentioned for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation for these securities. Evergreen actively manages client portfolios and securities discussed in this communication may or may not be held in such portfolios at any given time. This material has been prepared or is distributed solely for informational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Any opinions, recommendations, and assumptions included in this presentation are based upon current market conditions, reflect our judgment as of the date of this presentation, and are subject to change. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investments involve risk including the loss of principal. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed and Evergreen makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness.

  • Categories