SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are turning what had been a cautious IPO recovery into a direct test of public-market appetite for some of the world’s most capital-intensive growth stories.
SpaceX is the immediate focal point, targeting a roughly $1.75 trillion valuation and a Nasdaq debut as early as June 12. OpenAI and Anthropic, meanwhile, have each confidentially submitted draft S-1 registration statements, giving them the option to move toward public listings while keeping timing, size, and pricing details private.
The scale of all three businesses is extraordinary. So are their capital needs. These companies are not simply asking investors to buy growth; they are asking public markets to fund the infrastructure layer behind space, satellite connectivity, frontier AI, and next-generation compute. How investors respond could shape the IPO pipeline, the AI trade, and broader market momentum for the rest of 2026.
Company-by-Company Breakdown
SpaceX is the first and largest test. Reuters reported June 9 that investor demand for the IPO had reached more than $250 billion, or roughly 3.5 to 4 times the planned $75 billion offering. The company’s roadshow emphasized the durability of its launch business, the scale of Starlink, and the optionality of AI and space-based data centers.
That last piece matters because SpaceX is no longer being marketed only as a rocket and satellite company. It’s also asking investors to underwrite a much broader infrastructure platform.
The bull case rests on several pillars: SpaceX’s launch leadership, Starlink’s role as the financial engine, potential index-driven demand, and investor confidence in Elon Musk’s ability to expand into adjacent markets.
MSCI has confirmed that its early-inclusion rules could clear the way for SpaceX to enter its Global Standard Indexes shortly after listing, while Nasdaq and FTSE Russell rule changes could also support faster index eligibility. That could create a powerful technical bid from passive and benchmark-aware investors.
The bear case is valuation discipline. SpaceX generated $18.67 billion in revenue in 2025, posting a $4.94 billion net loss. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, public investors would be paying not only for current launch and Starlink economics, but also for future businesses that remain difficult to model.
OpenAI is likely to be viewed as the clearest public-market proxy for the commercial adoption of generative AI. The company announced on June 8 that it had submitted a confidential S-1, but it also said it has not decided on timing and may remain private for some time because certain strategic steps may be easier outside the public markets.
OpenAI’s case is built on consumer reach, enterprise adoption, developer usage, and access to compute. In March, the company said it closed $122 billion in committed capital at an $852 billion post-money valuation. It has also reported $2 billion in monthly revenue, more than 900 million weekly active users, more than 50 million subscribers, and enterprise revenue representing more than 40% of total revenue.
The central question for OpenAI is no longer whether demand exists. It is whether that demand can translate into durable margins after compute, model training, talent, and safety costs. If OpenAI moves forward with an IPO later this year, investors will likely focus less on user growth alone and more on operating leverage across its consumer, enterprise, API, and agentic workflow businesses.
Anthropic may present the most focused equity story of the three. The company confidentially submitted its draft S-1 on June 1 and said the number of shares and price range had not yet been set. Just days earlier, Anthropic announced a $65 billion Series H funding round at a $965 billion post-money valuation. It also said run-rate revenue crossed $47 billion in May, pointing to rising enterprise adoption of Claude and Claude Code.
Anthropic’s positioning is increasingly tied to enterprise AI, coding agents, safety, and compute access. That story gained another major data point this week when Apollo and Blackstone agreed to finance a $35 billion expansion of AI computing capacity using Broadcom custom chips and networking technology.
The financing strengthens Anthropic’s growth narrative, but it also highlights the central investor concern: frontier AI is becoming a capital-markets business as much as a software business. If Anthropic comes public near its latest private valuation, investors will need confidence that rapid adoption, premium pricing, and enterprise retention can justify the cost of scaling compute at unprecedented levels.
Risks and Investor Concerns
The clearest risk across all three companies is valuation. Private markets reward scale, strategic importance, and long-term growth narratives. Public investors are usually less forgiving. They will want a clearer bridge between revenue growth, capital intensity, cash flow, and eventual profitability.
Supply is another risk. A $75 billion SpaceX IPO would absorb a historic amount of capital on its own. If OpenAI and Anthropic follow within a compressed window, investors could face a rare concentration of mega-cap issuance tied to a narrow group of technology and infrastructure themes.
IPO Timing and Sequencing
Timing may be as important as valuation. SpaceX is the first live test, with trading targeted for as early as June 12. OpenAI and Anthropic have created optionality through confidential S-1 submissions, but neither has disclosed final terms or a firm listing date.
That means the market’s reaction to SpaceX could directly influence how aggressively the AI companies move and how bankers frame their valuation ranges. If SpaceX prices strongly and trades well, it could open the window for more ambitious terms from OpenAI and Anthropic. If it stumbles, the next deals may face a more skeptical audience.
For that reason, these IPOs are more than fundraising events. They are a referendum on whether public investors are willing to fund strategic, capital-intensive technology platforms before their long-term economics are fully settled. The answer will help determine not only the IPO calendar for the rest of 2026, but also how public and private markets value the next phase of AI, compute, and technology infrastructure.
DISCLOSURE: This material has been prepared or is distributed solely for informational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Any opinions, recommendations, and assumptions included in this presentation are based upon current market conditions, reflect our judgments as of the date of this presentation, and are subject to change. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed, and Evergreen makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness. Any projections, targets, or estimates in this presentation are forward looking statements and are based on ECM's research, analysis, and assumptions made by the Advisor. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. Past performance is not an indication or guarantee of future returns. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or the actual performance of the Advisor's proposed portfolio allocation may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. All investments involve risk including the loss of principal. Evergreen Gavekal clients may hold investments issued by or related to companies referenced in this commentary, including SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. This commentary does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security mentioned herein. References to specific companies are for informational and illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice tailored to any individual's financial situation or objectives.
